Trans rights are human rights

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

Across the Atlantic, Trump and his cronies are doing their very best to rewrite the definition of transgender out of existence. An agenda of social cleansing that feeds into his administration’s insular and antagonistic narrative. We may like to think that Trump’s views are in isolation, that his fear of difference does not seep to our shores, but it does.

20% of trans people still get pushed towards conversion therapy, even within our NHS

Thomas Reuters Foundation

The experience of many trans people is incredibly tough. A report from Thomas Reuters Foundation last week found that 20% of trans people still get pushed towards conversion therapy, even within our NHS; and another report from Stonewall showed that in the last year, 12% of trans people have attempted suicide.

12% of trans people have attempted suicide in the last year

Stonewall

With the Government’s consultation on the Gender Recognition Act having taken place this year, trans issues have been all over the mainstream media, with opponents viciously attacking some of society’s most vulnerable people. These attacks are shocking, and the perpetrators are often sat behind keyboards, unable or unwilling to see the damage their words can cause.

But in Transgender Awareness Week, I want to focus on the positives, and what we can do to improve the lives of trans people going forward.

Our party, the Liberal Democrats, exist to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity. Quite literally, that is our mantra, our values and we have always stood beside those facing inequality and attacks.

Transgender and intersex communities are too often marginalised, and many forget that trans rights are human rights.

Transgender and intersex communities are too often marginalised, and many forget that in the fight for equality, trans rights are human rights. We must, and we are, endeavouring to ensure that a vulnerable group of people, are able to live as they are entitled to under our laws.

But those laws need to be more flexible. The ‘spousal veto’, as it has been dubbed by the trans community – a law which enables the spouse of a trans person to veto their transition, needs to be changed, and I really want to believe that the Government will acknowledge this as part of the review of the GRA.

Gender dysphoria is a serious and not a casual condition. For anyone that has been through a transition, or supported another through it, they will see that the system does not meet the needs of those who access it, and that it is long, arduous and expensive.

We need to aspire to make things easier for people to transition if that is what what is right for them. It should be no-one else’s decision and the criteria should not be made so difficult to meet that people end up experiencing mental health issues because they feel despondent, anxious and isolated.

I know that in writing this blog I will be on the receiving end of abuse, but it is nothing compared to the abuse that our transgender friends and colleagues face every day.

This week especially, I want to ask you to support our transgender friends and colleagues, to create a better environment of acceptance and to provide a system that works and meets people’s human needs.

This week especially, I want to ask you to support our transgender friends and colleagues, to create a better environment of acceptance and to provide a system that works and meets people’s human needs.

Join our campaign to recognise that Trans Rights are Human Rights, as Liberal Democrats we believe their rights are key to our values and we will do everything possible to spread those values to improve our society, and the world we live in, whoever you are.

West Felton risks losing £325,000 CIL Local Funds to Oswestry

David Walker in West Felton

At our Last Parish Council meeting, during the report from our Shropshire Councillor, Steve Charmley, announced that there was £12m unspent in the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) ‘Local Fund’ pot and that they wanted to move this into the ‘Strategic’ pot because they didn’t have enough money to do the things they wanted to do. CIL wasn’t on the agenda itself so there wasn’t any discussion about the implications of this.

The implications for West Felton parish are very serious indeed and need to be strongly resisted. West Felton stands to lose over £325,000 from the parish’s Local Fund pot if this plan is implemented. That amounts to £550 per household. West Felton Parish Council has earned CIL money by virtue of having the new houses in the village. But more on that in a minute.

Firstly, some background to CIL

In my previous post, I highlighted that Shropshire Council’s cabinet has decided that West Felton is to have 130 more houses (45% more compared to 2011) during the plan period of 2016 to 2036. Some of those already have permission but have yet to be built. The last time parishioners were asked what housing they wanted for the 2013/14 Parish Plan 89% said they wanted to remain as ‘Open Countryside’. With the minority of the remaining 11% wanting the Parish to become a ‘Community Hub’. Shropshire Council has opted for ‘High’ housing growth and now that West Felton is a ‘Community Hub’ we will have to have our share of that growth. Until such time as I see evidence that the Parish has changed its view from 4 years ago, I will oppose any such growth. The Parish Council and Shropshire Council will be undertaking a new housing needs survey in the New Year.

David Walker, a Civil Engineering Sureyor, at one of the many unplanned housing sites.
David Walker, a Civil Engineering Surveyor, by the new houses being built on Ralf’s Drive, West Felton.

One of the upsides for local communities that have new houses is Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). CIL is a planning charge, introduced by the Planning Act 2008 which came into force in 2010. CIL is a tool for local authorities in England and Wales to help deliver infrastructure to support the development of their area. It is designed to help communities buy into having development when they can see the benefits of CIL for their community. Its aim is also to make the planning system “fairer, faster and more certain and transparent” for developers as they can predict the level of CIL before applying for planning permission. The old S106 system was determined after a site was applied for, making it difficult for developers to know how much it was going to be. CIL is calculated on the square meterage of a new house (£80 per square metre) built in West Felton. The extra houses in the Local Plan update for 2016-2036 will mean the amounts currently in the CIL pots will increase in value.

According to the Planning Act 2008 and Shirehall’s Place Plan Resource Pack there are 3 flavours of CIL:

Neighbourhood Fund

The Neighbourhood Fund is within the control of West Felton Parish Council and currently stands at about £67,000*. Defined as a ‘meaningful proportion’ of the levy. It can be spent on infrastructure projects.

Local Fund

The Local Fund is distributed by Shropshire Council in accordance with the code of practice (page 14). It currently just over £325,000. After the Neighbourhood fund is taken out, 90% of Shropshire Council’s portion is the Local Fund. “The Local Fund is for infrastructure priorities in the settlements within which the development has taken place within”.

Strategic Fund

The Strategic Fund is also distributed by Shropshire Council in accordance with the code of practice. After the Neighbourhood fund is taken out, 10% of Shropshire Council’s portion is the Strategic Fund. “Some infrastructure is vital to the delivery of Shropshire’s development strategy. This infrastructure has a strategic rather than a local focus, benefitting Shropshire as a whole. It is important that some monies (up to 10%) are used to meet these strategic requirements.”

The upshot… It isn’t fair on West Felton.

Transferring £325,000 of West Felton parish’s ‘Local Fund’ out of the parish and into Oswestry isn’t fair on any level. To understand just how unjust it is and how disproportionately West Felton would be hit by losing the CIL Local pot of money have a look at these charts:

CIL Local Fund: Top 20 parish areas in cash terms
CIL Local Fund: Top 20 parish areas in cash terms

Of the 165 parish areas in Shropshire West Felton (coloured in red) is the 43rd largest. Yet we have the 8th largest pot of CIL money. If we hadn’t have had the houses we didn’t want we would have been way down the list. There are 60 parish areas with zero Local Fund because they haven’t had any houses. To further put that into context look at the company we are keeping at the top. We have a bigger pot than Bridgnorth Town Council!! Above us are 4 town councils which you might expect, as well as 3 other parish councils – Baschurch, Hadnal and Oswestry Rural. 4 parish councils with a combined population in the 2011 census of 7,695 people have a Local Fund worth £1.4 million or a 10th of the whole CIL Local Fund for Shropshire. It is easy to see where houses have landed disproportionately. Shifnal was also punished by Shropshire Council’s policy failure.

CIL Local Fund: Top 20 parish areas per capita
CIL Local Fund: Top 20 parish areas per capita

Let’s put the pots into scale relative to population size, after all, Shrewsbury is a lot bigger than West Felton. Here is the distribution of the Local fund pots based on the number of people in each parish. Again West Felton is coloured red. West Felton now has the 7th largest pot of CIL Local per person – £220.37 per person or £560.40 per household. There were 580 households in 2011. Of the parish areas above us (Hadnal, Montford Bridge, Norton in Hales, Sutton upon Tern, Shifnal and Baschurch) only 1 is a town council. This list clearly shows where houses have been disproportionately allowed by the poor policy vacuum.

This is why the move by Shirehall should be opposed in the strongest terms.

It isn’t fair on small parishes that have had new housing.

On a superficial level, it might seem sensible if the 90% / 10% split is adjusted. However, it takes no account of where the need for infrastructure is now needed thanks to bad planning on the part of Shropshire Council. Retrospectively trying to claw money back because the houses were built in the wrong places is the wrong move. It is Shropshire Council’s fault. Penalising villages twice over by taking the Local fund money away is totally unjust.

West Felton has had houses outside of the adopted planning policy framework. This has placed an unplanned for and an unfair burned on the infrastructure of the village.

West Felton Parish Council has earned CIL money by virtue of having the new houses in the Village that it didn’t want. Moving the pot is a slap in the face for the residents of West Felton. It adds insult to injury. We will have had the pain of the new houses without the infrastructure gain.

I sent a question to Shirehall for Shropshire Council’s cabinet to consider, as I couldn’t get there in person. I asked the cabinet:

“Many areas are concerned about the proposed changes to the Local CIL pot and the implication for moving the attributed money from parishes to the Place Plan Centre. This is fine where the place plan centre is the natural hub for the surrounding parishes for things like economic development infrastructure. However, for infrastructure associated with other areas of infrastructure need at a strategic and local level don’t neatly fall into place plan areas.
“Take West Felton Parish Council which is 43rd in terms of the parish/town population. Yet the Local pot is the 7th largest per capita. The parish also has the 8th largest local pot in cash terms at over £325,000. If the local pot is used for infrastructure of say an educational nature then for West Felton the Secondary school catchment is to the Corbet school in Baschurch. Baschurch has also has had new housing development and their local pot stands at nearly £653,000. A combined £977,872.26. West Felton has its own employment site at Rednal which needs investment or we could need improved access for HGVs to ABP in Hordley and West Felton.
“Arguably the place plan areas are too big and don’t tie up to the Local Joint Committee areas.
“Will the cabinet alter their proposed policy to give the local pot to local joint committee areas rather than place plan areas or will they consider altering the ratio of allocation from 90/10 to 70/30 in favour of local places that have had the development.
“West Felton like other areas has felt the pain of unwanted houses through the council’s policy vacuum and lack of planning control. We have felt the pain so we should feel the gain.”

Many parishes are angry with Shropshire Council’ handling of CIL

St Martin’s Parish Council have written to the Shropshire Association of Local Councils (SALC) to express a similar desire for the Local Joint Committees to have the Local Fund. CIL has been discussed by the Town & Parish forum on more than one occasion. Len Sambrook, Chairman of Childs Ercall Parish Council, circulated a list to SALC member councils at the end of October

At short notice, I attended the SALC AGM last Friday (9th Nov) in Telford to support the following motion from Childs Ercall Parish council and Woore Parish Council:

“That Shropshire Council be formally requested by SALC to take no steps towards any amendment to the present arrangements in relation to the distribution of the Community Infrastructure Levy Local Fund without formal consultation with Shropshire’s Parish and Town Councils”

Speaking to the motion Len Sambrook told the meeting that many councils had submitted expressions of interest in the CIL Local fund only to be turned down by Shropshire Council because ‘the money was going to CIL strategic instead or simply delaying the applications.’

On Tuesday at West Felton’s next parish council meeting, I will ask the members to support sending a similar letter to SALC and Shirehall. I am livid with what Shirehall are up to. I will also ask them to set up a small task and finish group to progress CIL with some urgency.


Definitions:

Open Countryside is defined as the area outside of any settlement with a defined settlement boundary. Where only development that is essential for the purposes of agriculture, forestry, outdoor recreation, public infrastructure, essential works undertaken by public service authorities or statutory undertakers, or for other uses appropriate to a rural area will be permitted.

Community Cluster is a group of settlements without a development boundary which shares facilities and is likely to have at least a partial reliance upon other settlements to meet certain day-to-day needs.

Community Hub is generally considered to offer

sufficient services and facilities to meet the day-to-day needs of their resident

communities. They have a development boundary.

Place Plan Centre a settlement that serves the settlement’s resident communities, provide major employment and services to hubs and their surrounding rural hinterlands

West Felton 45% & Whittington 25% more houses since 2011

David Walker in West Felton

Across the Country and the Shropshire in particular, people are crying out for more affordable homes, to buy and rent. In Shropshire, the average house price is £220,352 with the average wage standing at £24,481. The average house is now 11 times the average wage. Putting most house beyond the reach of many ordinary hard-working people, particularly first time buyers. People who are battling every day with the rising cost of living whilst trying to save for a 20% deposit. They are pushed into private rental properties, which in turn inflates rents. This is exacerbated by an undersupply of housing and further compounded by those houses being purchased by speculators and investors. Similarly, those approaching retirement who want to downsize also face a lack of supply, again inflating prices.

Conservatives nationally and locally continue the same broad policies which have failed to deliver enough housing in the right places. Policies where supply is lead by developers who have a vested interest in limiting supply to keep prices high. Policies which continually fail to deliver enough houses to rent, part-rent or to buy for all income ranges. Without robust policies, we won’t build enough of the right homes in the right places and stop housing being built in the wrong places. Just building more houses is not the correct solution. We have to build more as a country and make sure they genuinely fit the needs of people and communities and not just the needs of a select few. Read more about housing supply in England and about the Liberal Democrats answers to the national problem.

On Tuesday this week Shropshire Council’s Cabinet met to consider, amongst other things:

  • Meeting Housing Need in Shropshire

    Shropshire Council building council houses. Something I have long supported for a long time (see: Right to Buy not sustainable shock… not) and the Liberal Democrats have been calling for nationally. I would support Shropshire Council Building new Council Houses.
  • Consultation on Preferred Sites for the Shropshire Local Plan Review

    Where to build houses for the new plan period 2016 to 2036
  • Community Infrastructure Levy [CIL] Regulation 123 List

    The list of infrastructure projects to be paid for by CIL

As a Civil Engineering Surveyor, who works for a Planning Consultancy and who is a Trustee of an Almshouse Charity delivering low-cost homes to people on low incomes, I know the proposed policy changes still fall far too short of what is needed. I.e., providing enough genuinely affordable homes for people, that allow people to stay in the communities that they were born in and to sustain local services. Letting developers build 4 & 5-bed executive homes everywhere is not sustainable nor what people need.

Despite being told everywhere that the plans are ‘modest’ Shropshire Council have opted for the ‘High’ housing growth option of 28,750 dwellings. CPRE Shropshire has said that the actual housing need for Shropshire is 18,000 houses The cabinet has approved growth higher than even the Government have suggested of 25,400 dwellings. You can also read the Shropshire Star’s report on the Conservative Council’s plans. Once again it leaves me with the impression that the growth plans are all about competing with Telford and using housing growth to fix their own budget problems rather than what is actually needed.

Why is this significant for West Felton?

For West Felton, in particular, the preferred sites report was very significant. West Felton has been slated to have 130 new houses over the plan period. West Felton parish had 600 households in 2011 whilst West Felton village itself had 290 households in 2011. The new housing represents a 19% increase for the parish and a whopping 45% increase for the village itself.

Also back in 2011, the then Parish Council Chairman was in the Shropshire star in a Call for no more homes in West Felton village. Saying: “We want to be regarded as a rural village where no new building takes place. We feel we have had more than our fair share. The infrastructure couldn’t cope with much more.

David Walker by another unplanned site in West Felton in 2017
West Felton has been burdened with houses they didn’t ask for. CIL is designed to ease that burden by paying for infrastructure to support housing development

As I have previously pointed out (See: Local Plan partial review) West Felton has had new housing development inflicted upon it, that the parish decided they didn’t want. In the Parish Plan 2013-14 (See Parish Plan summary here) after a comprehensive and extensive survey of residents, it was adopted that the parish should be ‘Open Countryside‘ a position supported by 89% of residents in the survey. Of the remainder ‘a considerable majority’ supported the Parish becoming a ‘Community Cluster‘ rather than becoming a ‘Community Hub‘. (See definitions below.)

Fast forward 7 years and the same person who called for ‘no more homes’ in the Shropshire Star was the main proponent of the parish becoming a ‘Community Hub‘ which has lead to the latest site for 60 houses being added to the village plan. How times have changed.

West Felton’s status has now changed from being ‘Open Countryside‘ to become a ‘Community Hub‘ – far removed from what the parish decided only 4 years ago! Until such time that I see evidence that the parish supports the move and the expansion of the village I remain opposed to it.

At the Parish Council in December last year, after a panel had worked on the response for a month, the council submitted a response to Shirhall’s consultation on the preferred scale and of distribution of settlement. The response was to endorse Shirehall’s approach. An approach that included West Felton becoming a Community Hub – the least popular option in the survey 5 years ago! A few councillors, myself included, expressed our concern that this would set a dangerous precedent and would lead to more houses being built in the parish.

Nearly a year later, at the Parish Council’s September meeting, the council adopted their preferred site for the Shropshire Council to adopt into the plan. As I remained opposed to the Parish becoming a Community Hub I voted against this and asked for my vote to be recorded in the minutes.

proposed housing site in West Felton for the period up to 2036
proposed housing site in West Felton for the period up to 2036

Why is this significant for Whittington?

Surveying Station Rd/Holyhead Rd junction visibility splay to help residents object to recent planning application
Surveying the Station Rd/Holyhead Rd junction visibility splay to help residents in Whittington object to a recent planning application

Whittington parish has been slated to have 360 new houses over the plan period. Whittington itself with 200 houses and 160 houses in Park Hall. Whittington parish had 1,071 households in 2011 whilst Whittington village itself had 642 households in 2011. The new housing represents a 34% increase for the parish and a more modest 25% increase for the village itself.

Like West Felton, the houses that will be built in Whittington parish won’t be of the right mix. There won’t be enough affordable home for local people to stay where they were born. If younger people are forced out of for price reasons then the population continues to age and all services become unsustainable for everybody.

Shropshire Council is supporting the vision of Oswestry Civic Society 2050 campaign and has opted to create a new Garden Village in Park Hall.

Oswestry Civic Society Oswestry 2050 map published via Oswestry Advertiser on 5th April 2018
Oswestry Civic Society Oswestry 2050 map published via Oswestry Advertiser on 5th April 2018

Is this going to lead to urban sprawl and the villages of Park Hall, Gobowen, Middleton, Whittington being subsumed into Oswestry? I believe there must now be quite a high risk that this will happen in the longer-term. Is that desirable? The jury is still out but I will be surveying residents on the plans soon.

Please participate in the consultations

On Tuesday this week, Shropshire Council’s Cabinet resolved to adopt the proposals and put them out for consultation. I will be doing a housing survey of my own soon. West Felton Parish Council and Shropshire Council will be conducting a housing needs survey in the New Year. I will post more details about that nearer the time but I would again urge everybody to participate. Please have your say.

The preferred sites for consultation document – including West Felton

The Consultation will run from Thursday 29 November 2018 until Thursday 31 January 2019. Details of the consultation will appear here soon:

https://shropshire.gov.uk/get-involved/


Definitions:

Community Infrastructure Levy(CIL) is a planning charge, introduced by the Planning Act 2008 came into force in 2010. CIL is a tool for local authorities in England and Wales to help deliver infrastructure to support the development of their area. It is designed to help communities buy into having development when they can see the benefits of CIL for their community. Its aim is to make the planning system “fairer, faster and more certain and transparent.” There are some very concerning noises coming from Shirehall that may break this link between development and the community having the houses.

Open Countryside is defined as the area outside of any settlement with a defined settlement boundary. Where only development that is essential for the purposes of agriculture, forestry, outdoor recreation, public infrastructure, essential works undertaken by public service authorities or statutory undertakers, or for other uses appropriate to a rural area will be permitted.

Community Cluster is a group of settlements without a development boundary which shares facilities and is likely to have at least a partial reliance upon other settlements to meet certain day-to-day needs.

Community Hub is generally considered to offer

sufficient services and facilities to meet the day-to-day needs of their resident

communities. They have a development boundary.

Place Plan Centre a settlement that serves the settlement’s resident communities, provide major employment and services to hubs and their surrounding rural hinterlands

Corbyn says “We can’t stop Brexit”

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

Jeremy Corbyn was askedIf you could stop Brexit, would you?

His response?

We can’t stop it. The referendum took place. Article 50 has been triggered.

But Brexit can be stopped through a People’s Vote

Vince Cable

This demonstrates, if proof were needed, that Jeremy Corbyn is working hand in glove with the Conservatives to deliver their ideological Brexit.

But Brexit can be stopped through a People’s Vote with the option to remain in the EU.

4 out of 5 people think that the Conservative Government is handling the Brexit negotiations badly. And last month 700,000 people marched on the streets of London to demand a People’s Vote.

Unfortunately, Corbyn hasn’t got either the fight or the inclination to get behind the campaign for a final say on the deal.

If you believe that the people should have the final say and the opportunity to demand better than this national embarrassment, join our campaign today.

Johnson resigns to back final say on Brexit

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

Today, Jo Johnson quit as a Conservative government minister over the Brexit deal Theresa May is putting together – a deal which gives people the worst of both worlds.

The choice being presented to the British people is no choice at all.

Jo Johnson MP

In his resignation statement, Johnson said that the deal being concocted will inflict “serious economic and political harm on the country”. He said what is happening is not what anyone wants and the 2016 referendum did not provide any mandate for it.

And he said that “on this most crucial of questions, I believe it is entirely right to go back to the people and ask them to confirm their decision to leave the EU”.

We agree wholeheartedly.

The Liberal Democrats have been campaigning for the people to have a final say on the Conservative government’s deal for two years.

On this most crucial of questions, I believe it is entirely right to go back to the people.

Jo Johnson MP

And slowly but surely, we are winning support from all corners of the political spectrum.

Mr Johnson becomes the 118th MP to support a People’s Vote. This is an incredible feat – but not nearly enough given that 51% of the public support it.

As Mr Johnson says, Britain stands on the brink of the greatest crisis since the Second World War.

We need to keep fighting to win a final say for the people and the opportunity to demand better than this national embarrassment.

Christmas Draw 2018 – 30 prizes inc £2,000 holiday voucher

Lib Dem Christmas Draw 2018

Would you like to win a £2,000 holiday voucher, in time from Christmas?! That’s just one of 30 prizes in this year’s Lib Dem Christmas Draw 2018 – tickets on sale NOW!

Buying your Lib Dem Christmas Draw tickets online at
https://libdemdraw.org.uk/north-shropshire not only gives you the chance to win yourself a great gift for Christmas but also raises funds for our Lib Dem campaigning here in North Shropshire too.

Tickets cost just £1 each, and you can buy online using your debit/credit card or PayPal account.

Give it a whirl, and best of luck for Draw Night on 8th December!

https://libdemdraw.org.uk/north-shropshire

Happy 20th birthday to the Human Rights Act!

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

20 years ago today the Human Rights Act became law, incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law.

The Liberal Democrats had been campaigning for the Human Rights Act ever since we were founded, but our fight to protect people’s rights and freedoms didn’t end when it passed…

Conservative and Labour MPs consistently vote for illiberal new laws that curtail civil liberties.

We opposed Labour’s attempts to curb civil liberties with ID cards, 90-day detention without charge and suspicionless stop-and-search.

In coalition, we prevented the Tories from scrapping the Human Rights Act, blocked their Snoopers’ Charter and passed the Protection of Freedoms Act to roll back Labour’s illiberal laws.

We demand a freer society where rights and liberties are protected.

And, of course, we introduced same-sex marriage, so that the law finally upholds their right to marry. Because LGBT+ rights are human rights.

We’re still fighting hard to protect human rights. That’s why we’re opposing the Tories’ latest Counter-Terror Bill, which contains unnecessary new laws that seriously threaten those rights.

Conservative and Labour MPs consistently vote for illiberal new laws that curtail civil liberties.

The Liberal Democrats demand better. We demand a freer society where rights and liberties are protected.

We will continue to defend the Human Rights Act, oppose any attempt to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights, and fight laws that unnecessarily erode civil liberties.

The Government is failing to meet post-Grenfell promises

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

It has been reported that more than 400 high-rise residential buildings still have the same type of external cladding blamed for the Grenfell Tower fire.

When it is about people’s homes, safety must come first.

Grenfell should never have happened. The fact that thousands of families are still living in unsafe high-rise buildings is a disgrace.

The Government is failing to meet the promises it made after the fire.

The Secretary of State committed to fully fund the removal and replacement of unsafe cladding by councils and housing associations, but there are still over 150 publicly owned buildings that are unsafe.

Furthermore, those in private residential buildings cannot be ignored.

The Government must not only meet its basic promises, but must go further and fund the same for the private sector. Money can be recovered at a later date but when it is about people’s homes, safety must come first.

We are dangerously close to shortage of critical drugs

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

A group including representatives of major pharmaceutical companies have written to the Health Secretary to state that if urgent action is not taken the UK will not have a medicine supply that will suffice in a no deal Brexit.

The Government simply cannot guarantee that there won’t be shortages of medicines

This letter makes it clear that we are dangerously close to not having a secure supply of the critical imported drugs or medical devices our health service depends on in a No Deal Brexit.

The letter from organisations including the ABPI, the Brexit Health Alliance, and the ABHI urges the Government to raise the warning level to ‘red’ in regards a widespread shortages of medicines and medical devices in no deal Brexit.

The organisations note David Lidington’s report to Cabinet that ‘the normal Dover-Calais route could be at 12% capacity for six months’. They do not believe the border and transport infrastructure can be ready for March 2019 and that time is very tight to address the problem.

The Government simply cannot guarantee that there won’t be shortages of medicines, whether in a No Deal or a Chequers Deal scenario.

Liberal Democrats demand better than this chaotic Brexit. People are entitled to a final say on Brexit in a People’s Vote and put a stop to this unnecessary, draining mess.

A stunning victory!

Vince Cable and Liberal Democrats on Europe March 2017

A Liberal Democrat amendment by Tavish Scott MSP has committed Holyrood to “providing unequivocal support for a public vote on the final terms of the Brexit deal”.

It passed convincingly in the Scottish Parliament, with 66 votes for the amendment, 28 against and 21 abstentions.

The Scottish Parliament giving its full support to a People’s Vote is an important step in the UK-wide campaign for a vote on the deal.

Days like these are how we are going to stop Brexit.

The Liberal Democrats have been leading the fight against Brexit since 2016. It is the biggest campaign we have ever run outside of an election and it is working.

A year ago, 20% of the British public believed that we needed a final say on the Brexit deal. Now that number is 51%.

The Liberal Democrats are the only major political party campaigning for a People’s Vote.